WE Report

Audits



Baker Hughes

No person selected

Report No.

1563
Baker Hughes deliveries to Oselvar PP&A and Gomez exploration well

Type of audit

External Audits
Baker Hughes

Auditee/Customer

Baker Hughes
DNO Norge AS

Date

2021/02/11

1761 days ago

Findings

7
Number of findings

Status

Closed
External Audits


Baker Hughes deliveries to Oselvar PP&A and Gomez exploration well
Summary

The goal with the verification was to verify Baker Hughes’ readiness for the Oselvar PP&A and the Gomez exploration well operations related to the verification scope (Chapter 2).
The verification was held in good atmosphere, the Baker Hughes participants were very open and willing to explain and share information.
Our general impression is that Baker Hughes is a professional company and ready for the upcoming operations. Baker Hughes will strengthen the deliveries for the DNO operations, especially the stability
and experience in the organization where dedicated personnel with minimum 10 years of experience has already been assigned to upcoming activities.
The Baker Hughes Operational System (BHOS), system for tools and experiences, and the handling of Covid-19 incl. the risk assessments stands out as robust.

Findings

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Baker Hughes to forward their reply on EPIM JQS audit finding from 2019 regarding Social Responsibility (grade C)

    All actions in Baker Hughes verification 11.02.2021 is closed out

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Check Oselvar well data; Baker inhouse vs. data
    provided by DNO (DONG reports)

    Performed in conjuction with Oselvar planning & Engineering

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Share Lessons learned from previous Lundin Field Brynhild (project where WHHs were locked to template)

    For Brynhild the WH cutting  was only a
    contingency and will  done later using a vessel.

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Check possible interfaces towards Borgland Dolphin

    Øystein Prytz and Astor have checked this

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Forward HSE statistics from Norway (2019-21)

    Received-ok

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Forward type of cement used on the Børselv well
    7220/6-3 (issues with cutting of WHH)

    Review of the incident showed that it was not the cement hardness, but rather the fact that part of the cement in the 20x 36 annulus broke loose during cutting and it’s weight prevented sufficient force to be put on the knives using normal cutting parameters. Resolved eventually by adding more pressure/force on the knives to overcome the weight.

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Share presentations from the verification meeting

    Received-ok



Additional Documentation

EA-2021-4_-Verification-report-Baker-Hughes.pdf


EA-2021-4_-Verification-report-Baker-Hughes.pdf




New Audit Report

You do not have permission to view this form.


\n


Baker Hughes

No person selected

Report No.

1563
Baker Hughes deliveries to Oselvar PP&A and Gomez exploration well

Type of audit

External Audits
Baker Hughes

Auditee/Customer

Baker Hughes
DNO Norge AS

Date

2021/02/11

1761 days ago

Findings

7
Number of findings

Status

Closed
External Audits


Baker Hughes deliveries to Oselvar PP&A and Gomez exploration well
Summary

The goal with the verification was to verify Baker Hughes’ readiness for the Oselvar PP&A and the Gomez exploration well operations related to the verification scope (Chapter 2).
The verification was held in good atmosphere, the Baker Hughes participants were very open and willing to explain and share information.
Our general impression is that Baker Hughes is a professional company and ready for the upcoming operations. Baker Hughes will strengthen the deliveries for the DNO operations, especially the stability
and experience in the organization where dedicated personnel with minimum 10 years of experience has already been assigned to upcoming activities.
The Baker Hughes Operational System (BHOS), system for tools and experiences, and the handling of Covid-19 incl. the risk assessments stands out as robust.

Findings

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Baker Hughes to forward their reply on EPIM JQS audit finding from 2019 regarding Social Responsibility (grade C)

    All actions in Baker Hughes verification 11.02.2021 is closed out

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Check Oselvar well data; Baker inhouse vs. data
    provided by DNO (DONG reports)

    Performed in conjuction with Oselvar planning & Engineering

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Share Lessons learned from previous Lundin Field Brynhild (project where WHHs were locked to template)

    For Brynhild the WH cutting  was only a
    contingency and will  done later using a vessel.

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Check possible interfaces towards Borgland Dolphin

    Øystein Prytz and Astor have checked this

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Forward HSE statistics from Norway (2019-21)

    Received-ok

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    N/A

    Forward type of cement used on the Børselv well
    7220/6-3 (issues with cutting of WHH)

    Review of the incident showed that it was not the cement hardness, but rather the fact that part of the cement in the 20x 36 annulus broke loose during cutting and it’s weight prevented sufficient force to be put on the knives using normal cutting parameters. Resolved eventually by adding more pressure/force on the knives to overcome the weight.

  • Actions

    Closed


    Closed


    Deadline was:

    Share presentations from the verification meeting

    Received-ok



Additional Documentation

EA-2021-4_-Verification-report-Baker-Hughes.pdf


EA-2021-4_-Verification-report-Baker-Hughes.pdf



\n”}}]}]}]},{“type”:”section”,”props”:{“class”:”uk-hidden”,”id”:”newreport”,”image_position”:”center-center”,”padding”:”none”,”style”:”default”,”title_breakpoint”:”xl”,”title_position”:”top-left”,”title_rotation”:”left”,”vertical_align”:””,”width”:”default”},”children”:[{“type”:”row”,”children”:[{“type”:”column”,”props”:{“image_position”:”center-center”,”position_sticky_breakpoint”:”m”},”children”:[{“type”:”html”,”props”:{“content”:”

\n

\n

New Audit Report